common indicator

The methodological document should explain, for each SO, the reasons behind selecting the indicators proposed. The RACER criteria are frequently used in selecting indicators. 

There should be a clear connection between the types of actions, the budget and the proposed indicators. Where specific indicators are proposed, there should be an explanation of why the common indicators were not relevant (on the basis of the definitions provided in the indicator fiches). The methodological document should also explain whether any lessons were learned from the use of indicators during the 2014-2020 programming period, which may support the decision to use or avoid using certain indicators.

This is essential for programmes that are planning to include many programme-specific indicators and/or few common ones. 

A good intervention logic starts with identifying the needs, their corresponding objectives and how the available budget can be allocated to the various objectives/actions. Once the budgeting has been done, the available budget can be used in calculating the targets.

la Baseline correcte est bien: ‘>=0’ – si il s’agit d’un nouvel établissement, la Baseline peut être égale à ‘0’ ; dans tout autre cas, celle-ci devra être supérieure ‘>0’. 

The correct baseline for RCR11 is >=0 - if the public digital services, products and processes are new, the baseline may be equal to 0, in all other cases, it should be >0.  

The correct baseline for RCR12 is >=0 - if the public digital services, products and processes developed by enterprises are new, the baseline may be equal to 0, in all other cases, it should be >0.  

The correct baseline for RCR64  is >=0 - if the cycling infrastructure is new, the baseline may be equal to 0, in all other cases, it should be >0.  

Indeed, the baseline refers to the annual volume of water losses for the respective pipes in the year before the intervention starts, which should not equal to zero when using this indicator.

/renovated spaces accessible for the public?

ANSWER

Yes, creating a specific result indicator is necessary and the one proposed seems appropriate. Giving the resemblance to RCR95, it would be good to set a limit to the population included, such as the population living within a 2 km radius from the open space created or rehabilitated.

The population covered depends on the strategy, its geographic area and any criteria included in the strategy that may restrict the categories of people targeted (otherwise, it will be the entire population living in that geographic area or administrative unit).

The indicator only covers classroom capacity, which could include gyms, but external facilities and accommodation are not covered.