igj

Which amount should I enter in the table?

1. the amount entered in the last payment application?
2. the amount paid to beneficiaries? (because of overpayment A > B)

The same amounts as you would declare in the payment applications. If a final payment application for that accounting year was submitted the system will automatically take its amounts. When no final payment was submitted the most recent amounts for that accounting year as if it was a final payment application declaration has to be entered.

Yes, the Accounts should be submitted (with zero expenditure), a disclaimer of opinion can be issued (in section Audit opinion > Opinion).

The updated guidance note "Guidance for Member States on the Annual Control Report and Audit Opinion to be reported by audit authorities and on the treatment of errors detected by audit authorities in view of establishing and reporting reliable total residual error rates (EGESIF_15-0002-04)" is published on Inforegio(*) under Management and Control and clarifies that:

(refer to page 37)

Yes, unless no expenses are declared in Appendix 1 and Appendix 7 of the Accounts.

When creating the Accounts the system automatically copies the amounts in Appendix 1 and Appendix 7 from the Final Payment Application for the Accounting year.

If the Final Payment Application has not been submitted in SFC2014, the same amounts that would be declared in the Final Payment Application should be entered in Appendix 1 and Appendix 7.

 For tables 8, 9 & 10 the tables need to be filled out with ‘0’ even if this value is due to the fact that the corresponding provisions wasn't used in the regulatory framework. The Commission cannot check whether these provisions were applied or not, as this information is not part of the Operational Programme. However, if there are 0 values in the financial tables on the number of selected operations, it can be concluded that the blanks in tables 8-10 can only mean a 0 value. 

In SFC2014 the name of the financial instrument is used as an identifier and each name can be used only once. If a financial instrument covers more than one Priority Axis, and in order to provide the data for all contributions to the financial instrument, the appreciation of the priority axis should be added under different names, for example,  Investment Holding PA1,  Investment Holding PA2, … in the IR (section 8)   

The records in Table 1 are automatically created from Table 3 of the linked programme at creation time (from Table 10 for TA Priority Axes/Specific Objectives). If the authorities have defined the indicator as a qualitative indicator in the programme the achievement values are also qualitative.

When the indicator is a qualitative indicator you need to provide a value for "2019 qualitative" and "2018 qualitative" in Table 1 of the AIR. The total fields will not be editable.