Skip to main content
European Commission logo
SFC Support Portal
System for Fund Management in the European Union

Output

RCO 59 - Alternative fuels infrastructure (refuelling/recharging points)* - The indicator fiche mentions: “Number of refuelling/ recharging points for clean vehicles financed through supported projects.”, but does not explicitly clarify that it

it refers only to refuelling/ recharging points dedicated to electric public transport. Does this indicator covers refuelling/ recharging points accessible for electric (private) vehicle? 
We would appreciate supporting us with indicative costs of this type of infrastructure (recharging/refuelling) as it is defined in the indicator fiche. “A recharging point means an interface that is capable of charging one electric vehicle at a time or exchanging a battery of one electric vehicle at a time. A refuelling point refers to a refuelling facility for the provision of alternative fuel through a fixed or a mobile installation”.
 

ANSWER 

Yes, the indicator includes refuelling/charging points available to private vehicles.

For indicative costs, we do not have such information. 

If supported by the intervention logic, could we use common output indicators in PO 4 (in accordance with Table 1 of Annex I of Reg. EU 2021 / 1058) not marked with an asterisk (*) to other specific objectives within PO 4;

For example RCO70 Capacity of new or modernised social care facilities (except housing) under S.O 4v could also be used under S.O. 4.iii. 
 

ANSWER

No, common  indicators  without asterisks  are  not  available  outside  the specific  objective  concerned  in  order  to  encourage  programmes  to  focus  on  the collection  of  the  most  relevant  common  indicators  and  limit  the  burden  to  report  on ancillary outputs or results. However, if deemed appropriate by the MA, the indicator can be used in another SO by using a programme-specific indicator code (i.e. RCO66a) 

RCO04 is used when non-financial support is given. There is a (non-exclusive) list of support services in the indicator’s fiche, but could the benefitting enterprises also be counted here? Can we also count the jobs created under the indicator RCR01?

The indicator relates to the enterprises targeted (forecast) and benefiting from the non-financial support. Potentially benefiting enterprises should not be counted. Only actual beneficiaries should be reported. 
In the case of job creation in the enterprises supported, this should be reported as a result indicator.

Avec la suppression du RCO99, les sites naturels remarquables hors natura 2000 bénéficiant d’une opération de protection de la nature et de la biodiversité peuvent-ils relever de cet indicateur?

Afin de remplacer l’indicateur RCO99, nous avons créé pour la période 2021-2027 un groupe d’indicateurs complémentaires (RCO26/RCO36/RCO37). Pour le type de sites que vous mentionnez, nous recommandons le recours à l’indicateur RCO36.

RCO25 indicateur doit être mesuré en km. Pour plusieurs AG, les ouvrages financés correspondent à des zones d’extension des crues mesurées en hectares. Dans ce cas, la zone d’extension des crues doit-elle plutôt relever du RCO26?

Do "regions" refered to in the definition of the indicator RCO96 mean NUTS2 or NUTS3 regions?

The definition of the indicator RCO96 refers to NUTS2 regions. This implies that investments between two NUTS3 within the same NUTS2 would not count. The definition states the following: “The indicator covers interregional investments for innovation in projects which involve cooperation of at least two NUTS2 regions.”

Does RCO38 'Surface area of rehabilitated land supported' cover the construction of, for example, social housing or cultural/sport facilities?

No, it does not include construction works. The measurement unit is hectares, so the indicator will capture only the surface area rehabilitated. If the project involves rehabilitation + constructions, you can use it only for the surfaces of rehabilitated land (hectares) and possibly couple it with RCR 52.

In RCO96 does interregional cooperation refer also to cooperation within a MS or only that between two or more MSs?

For indicator RCO96, interregional cooperation refers also to regions within an MS, both between two regional programmes, or in the same national programme. For the national programmes, however, the following rule for double counting applies: “Interregional investments between two NUTS2 regions supported from the same operational programme should be considered only once.” For regions covered by several programmes, the rule for double counting states the following: “When interregional investments are covered by more than one operational programme, a given operational programme should report only the amount invested in partner regions (i.e. outside the programme area).”